navigations help

main navigation

to navigation help

 

page content

Studies of complex magnetic, strongly correlated materials in which lattice degrees of freedom play a significant role

A number of materials with interesting magnetic properties have been studied with special attention to lattice degrees of freedom. Some experience with the correct application of ab initio molecular dynamics to materials with transition metal centers has been collected. Careful preparation of structures was often a prerequisite of these investigations, either because materials that were not yet synthesized were investigated (see a) Cu4Te5O12Br4) or because the published structure lacked the precision necessary for precise DFT study (see b) azurite Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2). In most materials studied in this area, contact between the material and many body models was made by determination of effective Hamiltonian parameters via Nth order muffin tin orbital (NMTO) downfolding or tight binding (TB).


a) Coupled tetrahedra quantum spin systems Cu4Te5012Cl4 and
Cu4Te5O12Br4

Bild ohne Titel
The family of oxyhalides which include Cu2Te2O5X2 (X=Br and Cl) and Cu4Te5O12Cl4 are quantum spin systems containing weakly coupled Cu42+ tetrahedra. The exchange interactions in the tetrahedra are geometrically frustrated, and thus small changes in the inter-tetrahedra couplings can lead to unconventional ground states. In particular, there is experimental evidence pointing to a closeness of the Cu2Te2O5Br2 system to a quantum critical point. While for the Cu2Te2O5X2-system the various intra- and intertetrahedral couplings have been determined by NMTO downfolding [1] and subsequently confirmed by neutron diffraction experiments [2], the present work addresses the changes in exchange couplings in Cu4Te5O12Cl4 with respect to Cu2Te2O5Cl2 due to the slightly changed arrangements of the Cu42+ tetrahedra in the crystal structure and the couplings that would be expected for the hypothetical, not yet synthesized system Cu4Te5O12Br4. The latter involved the determination of a likely crystal structure with the help of Car Parrinello molecular dynamics [3]. For Cu4Te5O12Cl4, we find that while the overall nature of the interaction remains the same as in Cu2Te2O5Cl2, the diagonal interaction between tetrahedra is strongly reduced while the out-of-plane interaction is strongly enhanced. The hypothetical Cu4Te5O12Br4 system shows in general stronger in-plane intertetrahedral couplings compared to the Cl system. These results are published in references [VSJ+07,RJV+07].

b) Diamond spin chain azurite Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2
Azurite has been intensely discussed since magnetic measurements found a 1/3 magnetization plateau [4]. The Cu2+ spins in azurite are arranged in a diamond chain formed by alternating Cu2+ dimers and monomers. Several experiments [4,5] and theoretical interpretations of experiments [6] have come to completely different sets of parameters for the underlying magnetic Hamiltonian. This dispute makes a first principle analysis of this material very interesting.
It turns out that the structural parameters have not been determined with sufficient precision, which leads to a failure of convergence of the FPLAPW calculation. Thus, we first carefully relax the light atom positions before extracting the low energy effective Hamiltonian parameters. These parameters are determined by a tight binding fit to the band structure as well as from energy differences between different spin configurations. The resulting picture for azurite compares well to experimental observations.


1
R. Valentí, T. Saha-Dasgupta, C. Gros, and H. Rosner, Phys. Rev. B 67, 245110 (2003).

2
O. Zaharko, H. Ronnow, J. Mesot, S. J. Crowe, C. McK. Paul, P. J. Brown, A. Daoud-Aladine, A. Meents, A. Wagner, M. Prester, and H. Berger, Phys. Rev. B 73, 064422 (2006).

3
R. Car, M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2471 (1985).

4
H. Kikuchi, Y. Fujii, M. Chiba, S. Mitsudo, T. Idehara, T. Tonegawa, K. Okamoto, T. Sakai, T. Kuwai, H. Ohta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 227201 (2005).

5
K. C. Rule, A. U. B. Wolter, S. Süllow, D. A. Tennant, A. Brühl, S. Koehler, B. Wolf, M. Lang, J. Schreuer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 117202 (2008).

6
B. Gu, G. Su, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 089701 (2006).

Footer


Print version: Feb. 17, 2017